dc.contributor.author | Abdalrahman, Basheer Mohamed | |
dc.contributor.author | Holmes, Haly | |
dc.contributor.author | Peck, Mogammad T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Basson, Nicolaas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-23T09:30:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-23T09:30:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Abdalrahman, B.M. et al. (2016). In vitro antimicrobial comparison of three commercially available chlorhexidine-based oral rinses. South African Dentristry Journal, 71(7): 304 - 307 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0375-1562 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10566/3725 | |
dc.description.abstract | INTRODUCTION: Commercially available chlorhexidine (CHX)
formulations differ in their CHX concentrations (0.2% and
0.12%) as well as in various additives including alcohol,
antimicrobials such as cetylpyridinium chloride and antidiscolouration
chemicals such as ascorbic acid and sodium
metabisulphite.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To compare in vitro the antimicrobial
efficacies of three different CHX preparations (Corsodyl
®, Curasept® and GUM® Paroex®) using 0.2% and
0.12% CHX concentrations as controls
METHODS: A disk diffusion test was performed using
pure cultures of the organisms Streptococcus mutans
and Candida albicans, and mixed cultures (facultative and
strict anaerobes) prepared from oral rinse samples of 14
study participants. The means and standard deviations of
the diameters of inhibition zones were calculated.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference (p value =
0.0001) was found only in Candida albicans cultures between
the mean inhibition zones of the CHX preparation
disks. Pure CHX preparations and Corsodyl® showed higher
antifungal efficacy than Curasept® and GUM® Paroex
Conclusion: Both CHX preparations (0.12% and 0.2%)
and the 0.2% CHX preparation containing alcohol
(Corsodyl®) have more potent antifungal properties against
C. albicans than alcohol-free 0.12% CHX preparations
such as Curasept® and GUM® Paroex®. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | South African Dental Association | en_US |
dc.rights | This file may be freely used for educational uses. No commercial reproduction or distribution of this file is permitted without written permission of the South African Dental Association (SADA). Note that the SADA retains all intellectual property rights in the article. | |
dc.subject | Chlorhexidine (CHX) | en_US |
dc.subject | Antimicrobial efficacies | en_US |
dc.subject | Oral rinses | en_US |
dc.title | In vitro antimicrobial comparison of three commercially available chlorhexidine-based oral rinses | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.privacy.showsubmitter | FALSE | |
dc.status.ispeerreviewed | TRUE | |
dc.description.accreditation | DHET | |