Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLawrence, Estelle
dc.contributor.authorStruthers, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorVan Hove, Geert
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-06T07:51:50Z
dc.date.available2018-07-06T07:51:50Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationLawrence, E. et al. (2016). A mobile school-based HCT service – is it youth friendly? Sahara-J, 13(1): 123 - 135.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1813-4424
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC195626
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/3854
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Despite an increase in HIV Counselling and Testing (HCT), few young people have been tested. It has been suggested that they do not test because formal health services (where HCT is provided) are often not youth friendly. The World Health Organisation describes a youth-friendly health service (YFHS) as one which is accessible, equitable, acceptable, appropriate, and effective. A mobile school-based model has been implemented by a non-governmental organisation in Cape Town in an attempt to make HCT more youth friendly and accessible to young people. The objective of this study was to explore whether this mobile school-based HCT service is youth friendly. METHODS: The study was descriptive, using three qualitative data collection methods: observation of the HCT site at two secondary schools; interviews with six service providers; and direct observation of 21 HCT counselling sessions. KEY RESULTS: The mobile school-based HCT service fulfilled some of the criteria for being a YFHS. The service was equitable in that all students, irrespective of race, gender, age, or socio-economic status, were free to use the service. It was accessible in terms of location and cost, but students were not well informed to make decisions about using the service. The service was acceptable in that confidentiality was guaranteed and the service providers were friendly and nonjudgemental, but it was not considered acceptable in that there was limited privacy. The service was appropriate in that HCT is recommended as an intervention for decreasing the transmission of HIV, based on evidence and expert opinion; however, in this case, HCT was provided as a stand-alone service rather than part of a full package of services. Moreover, studies have suggested that young people want to know their HIV status. The service was ineffective in that it identified students who are HIV positive; however, these students were not assisted to access care. CONCLUSION: Providing HCT in the school setting may make HCT more accessible for students, but it needs to be provided in an equitable, accessible, acceptable, and effective way.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Openen_US
dc.rights# 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectHIV/AIDSen_US
dc.subjectHIV Counselling and Testingen_US
dc.subjectYouthen_US
dc.subjectStudentsen_US
dc.subjectSchoolen_US
dc.subjectYouth friendlyen_US
dc.titleA mobile school-based HCT service – is it youth friendly?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.privacy.showsubmitterFALSE
dc.status.ispeerreviewedTRUE
dc.description.accreditationISI


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record