Library Portal | UWC Portal
    • Login
    Contact Us | Quick Submission Guide | About Us | FAQs | Login
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • Faculty of Community and Health Sciences
    • Physiotherapy
    • Research Articles (Physiotherapy)
    • View Item
    •   Repository Home
    • Faculty of Community and Health Sciences
    • Physiotherapy
    • Research Articles (Physiotherapy)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Cost-effectiveness of the HiBalance training program for elderly with Parkinson’s disease: analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Joseph_Cost-effectiveness_2018.pdf (1.797Mb)
    Date
    2018
    Author
    Joseph, Conran
    Brodin, Nina
    Leavy, Breiffni
    Hagstromer, Maria
    Lofgren, Niklas
    Franzén, Erika
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of the HiBalance training program for managing Parkinson’s disease (PD)-related balance and gait disorders. DESIGN: Cost comparison design following the randomized controlled trial comparing a novel balance training intervention with care as usual. SUBJECTS: A total of 100 participants with mild–moderate PD were randomized to either the intervention (n = 51) or the control group (n = 49). INTERVENTION: A 10-week (three times per week), group-based, progressive balance training program, led by two physical therapists. MAIN OUTCOMES: All program costs were collected for both groups. Cost-utility was evaluated using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost-effectiveness measures were the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest; assessing balance performance) and gait velocity. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted. RESULTS: The between-group difference in QALYs was 0.043 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.011–0.075), favoring the intervention group. Between-group differences in balance performance and gait velocity were 2.16 points (95% CI: 1.19–3.13) and 8.2 cm/second (95% CI: 2.9–13.6), respectively, favoring the intervention group. The mean cost per participant in the intervention group was 16,222 SEK (€1649) compared to 2696 SEK (€274) for controls. The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were 314,558 SEK (€31,969) for an additional QALY, 6262 SEK (€631) for one point improvement in balance performance, and 1650 SEK (€166) for 1 cm/second increase in gait velocity. Sensitivity analyses indicated a high probability (85%) of program success. CONCLUSION: In terms of QALYs, the HiBalance program demonstrated a high probability of cost-effectiveness in the short-term perspective when considering the willingness-to-pay thresholds used in Europe.
    URI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215518800832
    http://hdl.handle.net/10566/4078
    Collections
    • Research Articles (Physiotherapy) [184]

    DSpace 5.5 | Ubuntu 14.04 | Copyright © University of the Western Cape
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace 5.5 | Ubuntu 14.04 | Copyright © University of the Western Cape
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV