Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHall, Ruth
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-25T11:23:46Z
dc.date.available2019-02-25T11:23:46Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationThe CROSCOG project team. (2009). Commons Governanace in South Africa. Policy Brief 28, Bellville: Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Capeen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/4282
dc.description.abstractThe commons (or common-pool resources)1 are the most important resources in southern Africa. The livelihoods of the majority and economies of most countries depend on them. Although common property regimes are often condemned as environmentally unsustainable, economically unviable or socially anachronistic, this mode of natural resource tenure and governance remains vitally necessary in the livelihoods of the rural poor across much of the region (Hara et al., 2009). Away from a limited number of project-based efforts for communitybased management (often focused on specific natural resource sectors), such as Zimbabwe’s high-profile CAMPFIRE, millions of poor, rural people across the region continue their own integrated efforts to manage and live from the ecosystems that surround them. This, above all, is a challenge to governance. The poor must tackle it – and governments and development agencies must support their endeavours (ibid.).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Capeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPolicy Brief;2009
dc.subjectCommonsen_US
dc.subjectSouthern Africaen_US
dc.subjectSocially anachronisticen_US
dc.subjectResourcesen_US
dc.subjectUnsustainableen_US
dc.titleA fresh start for rural development and agrarian reform?en_US
dc.typeOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record