Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSukume, Chrispen
dc.contributor.authorMavedzenge, Blasio
dc.contributor.authorMurimbarima, Felix
dc.contributor.authorScoones, Ian
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-11T12:44:48Z
dc.date.available2019-03-11T12:44:48Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationSukume, C. et al. (2015). Space, markets and employment in agricultural development: Zimbabwe country report. Research Report 46. Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Capeen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/4495
dc.description.abstractSince independence in 1980, Zimbabwe has undergone several phases of land redistribution, generally to communal and working people. The latest phase was the Fast-Track Land Reform Programme (FTLRP), which began in 2000 and redistributed 10.82 million hectares of land to 168 671 mainly small-scale producers (Moyo 2011). The result has been a major transformation of the farming landscape, with large-scale farms and ranches giving way to multiple smaller farms in an array of sizes. However, land reform on its own is not a cure for all rural economic development challenges. Land redistribution addresses the problem of land access – a key resource in generating farm-based employment and income – but, in addition, there is the need to create non-farm employment within the new rural spaces. This is an issue of central importance for agricultural development policy: not only because there are many people in rural areas who are landless or not involved in agricultural production, and who, therefore, do not benefit directly from land reform provisions, but also because large-scale agricultural investment projects, and increases in the productivity and efficiency of agriculture, may lead to people being displaced from land. Internationally, the existence of a large and growing population of landless and unemployed people, no longer involved in agriculture but unable to find a foothold in the non-farm economy, seriously compromises poverty reduction, food security, well-being and stability. Yet, the impact of agricultural development decisions on non-farm employment is often disregarded by policy-makers, who assume that those not finding employment in agriculture can be absorbed into the economy in other ways.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Capeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch Report;46
dc.subjectSpaceen_US
dc.subjectMarketsen_US
dc.subjectAgricultural developmenten_US
dc.subjectZimbabween_US
dc.subjectPoverty reductionen_US
dc.titleSpace, markets and employment in agricultural development: Zimbabwe country reporten_US
dc.typeOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record