Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMbazira, Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-07T06:02:36Z
dc.date.available2019-10-07T06:02:36Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationMbazira, C. (2011). 'Grootboom: A paradigm of individual remedies versus reasonable programmes'. Southern African Public Law, 26(1): 60 - 80en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/4964
dc.description.abstractThe decision of the Constitutional Court (the Court) in the case of Government of the Republic of South Africa versus Grootboom was received as ground breaking by human rights practitioners, scholars and advocates the world over. If it were possible to assess the case in terms of new music releases, one would say that the 'Grootboom album' became an instant hit on the top of all music charts. The case instantly established itself as a landmark, signifying the undeniable justiciability of economic and social rights (socio-economic rights). Thus, the case became a promise that the lives of South Africans living in crisis-like situations would be changed for the better. The Court's reasonable programme review approach instantly became the litmus test with which to determine whether government has discharged its obligations to realise the various constitutionally protected economic, socio-economic rights.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSouthern African Public Lawen_US
dc.subjectGrootboom caseen_US
dc.subjectIndividual remediesen_US
dc.subjectReasonable programmesen_US
dc.subjectConstitutional Courten_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.titleGrootboom: A paradigm of individual remedies versus reasonable programmesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record