Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMujuzi, Jamil Ddamulira
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-04T07:51:20Z
dc.date.available2020-12-04T07:51:20Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationMujuzi, J.D. (2020) Prisoners' right to vote in Uganda: Comment on Kalali Steven v Attorney General and the Electoral Commission. Journal of African Elections, 19(2): 18-32. DOI: 10.20940/JAE/2020/v19i2a2en_US
dc.identifier.issn16094700
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.20940/JAE/2020/v19i2a2
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.eisa.org/pdf/JAE19.2Mujuzi.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/5480
dc.description.abstractArticle 59 of the Constitution of Uganda (1995) provides for the right to vote. Although the Constitution does not prohibit prisoners from voting, the Uganda Electoral Commission has never made arrangements for prisoners to vote. On 17 June 2020, in the case of Kalali Steven v Attorney General and the Electoral Commission, the Ugandan High Court held that prisoners and Ugandans in the diaspora have a right to vote and that the Electoral Commission should put in place arrangements for them to vote. Uganda will have elections in 2021. The purpose of this article is to suggest practical ways in which the Electoral Commission can comply with the High Court judgement. It is argued, inter alia, that there is no need for legislation to be enacted or amended to give effect to the High Court judgment.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEISAen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.subjectCorrectional servicesen_US
dc.subjectElectionsen_US
dc.subjectPrisonersen_US
dc.subjectElectoral Commissionen_US
dc.subjectPrisoners' rightsen_US
dc.titlePrisoners' right to vote in Uganda: Comment on Kalali Steven v Attorney General and the Electoral Commissionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record