| dc.contributor.author | Ashraf, Booley | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-18T09:14:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-06-18T09:14:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ashraf, B. (2020). COVID-19 versus contractual obligations: case in point South Africa?. Without Prejudice, 20(6), 42-43 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1681-178X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1e6c86e0d1 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10566/6297 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The 23rd of March 2020 will forever be etched in the minds of all South Africans: President Cyril Ramaphosa declared a 21-day national lockdown effective from midnight on Thursday, 26 March to Thursday, 16 April to curb the spread of the coronavirus (referred to as COVID-19). | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Without Prejudice | en_US |
| dc.subject | Covid-19 | en_US |
| dc.subject | South Africa | en_US |
| dc.subject | National lockdown | en_US |
| dc.subject | Contractual obligations | en_US |
| dc.title | COVID-19 versus contractual obligations: case in point South Africa? | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
