Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorManie, Latiefa
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-18T10:12:37Z
dc.date.available2021-06-18T10:12:37Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationManie, L. (2020). The limiting effect of Daffy v Daffy 2013 1 SACR 42 (SCA). Journal of South African Law ,3, 596-604en_US
dc.identifier.issn0257 – 7747
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1e4892ccb7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/6303
dc.description.abstractThe preamble of the Domestic Violence Act 116 of 1998 recognises, inter alia: “that domestic violence is a serious social evil; that there is a high incidence of domestic violence within South African society; that victims of domestic violence are among the most vulnerable members of society; that domestic violence takes on many forms; that acts of domestic violence may be committed in a wide range of domestic relationships; and that the remedies currently available to the victims of domestic violence have proved to be ineffective.” Domestic violence is a social evil that often occurs behind closed doors. In S v Baloyi the constitutional court indicated that: “All crime has harsh effects on society. What distinguishes domestic violence is its hidden, repetitive character and its immeasurable ripple effects on our society and, in particular, on family life. It cuts across class, race, culture and geography, and is all the more pernicious because it is so often concealed and so frequently goes unpunished” (2000 2 SA 425 (CC) 431C).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJutaen_US
dc.subjectDomestic violenceen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectDomestic relationshipen_US
dc.subjectDisciplinary enquiryen_US
dc.titleThe limiting effect of Daffy v Daffy 2013 1 SACR 42 (SCA)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record