Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClark, Jocalyn
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Asha
dc.contributor.authorKhosla, Rajat
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T07:20:44Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T07:20:44Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationClark, J. et al. (2023). No pandemic preparedness and research without gender equality. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 381, 1213. 10.1136/bmj.p1213en_US
dc.identifier.issn1756-1833
dc.identifier.uri10.1136/bmj.p1213
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/9119
dc.description.abstractThe covid-19 emergency may have been declared over, but its effects are not. Pre-existing inequities worsened during the pandemic, and the crisis has hardened societal fault lines. Sex and gender mark many of these. Early on, sex and gender featured visibly as men seemed at higher risk of infection and hospital admission, and women of longer term illness and caregiving burdens. Over time, it became evident that covid-19 was exacerbating multiple and intersecting vulnerabilities, with substantial effects on women and girls: increased care burdens, amplified gender based violence during lockdowns, catastrophic drops in income and employment for women and families, disrupted essential health services, and school closures that heightened risk of unintended pregnancies and permanent dropouts.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNLM (Medline)en_US
dc.subjectPublic healthen_US
dc.subjectGender studiesen_US
dc.subjectEqualityen_US
dc.subjectCovid-19en_US
dc.subjectAfricaen_US
dc.titleNo pandemic preparedness and research without gender equalityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record