Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNaidoo, Sudeshni
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-02T15:13:36Z
dc.date.available2016-06-02T15:13:36Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationNaidoo, S. (2015). Irrational requests for extractions. South African Dental Journal, 70(8): 364 - 365en_US
dc.identifier.issn0011-8516
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/2261
dc.description.abstractDental professionals encounter a number of challenging ethical and legal dilemmas on a daily basis that often arise due to conflicts between the ethical principles of autonomy, non-maleficence (do no harm), beneficence (do good), justice, veracity, and fidelity. The application of ethical principles has always been important during any patient encounter, and previously a health professional's obligation was focussed on doing good and avoiding harm rather than giving in to the patient's requests. Today a patientcentred holistic approach and respect for patient autonomy is a more apparent in health care.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSouth African Dental Associationen_US
dc.rights.uriThis file may be freely used for educational uses. No commercial reproduction or distribution of this file is permitted without written permission of the South African Dental Association (SADA). Note that the SADA retains all intellectual property rights in the article.
dc.source.urihttp://ref.scielo.org/jvsxyb
dc.subjectEthics
dc.subjectDental ethics
dc.subjectExtraction of teeth
dc.titleIrrational requests for extractionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.privacy.showsubmitterFALSE
dc.status.ispeerreviewedTRUE
dc.description.accreditationDHETen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record