Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrierley, Andrew S.
dc.contributor.authorBoyer, David C.
dc.contributor.authorAxelson, Bjorn Erik
dc.contributor.authorLynam, Christopher P.
dc.contributor.authorSparks, Conrad A.J.
dc.contributor.authorBoyer, Helen
dc.contributor.authorGibbons, Mark J.
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-08T07:49:57Z
dc.date.available2011-09-08T07:49:57Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationBrierley, A.S., et al. (2005). Towards the acoustic estimation of jellyfish abundance. Marine Ecology Progress Series 295: 105-111.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0171-8630
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/247
dc.description.abstractAcoustic target strengths (TSs) of the 2 most common large medusae, Chrysaora hysoscella and Aequorea aequorea, in the northern Benguela (off Namibia) have previously been estimated (at 18, 38 and 120 kHz) from acoustic data collected in conjunction with trawl samples, using the ‘comparison method’. These TS values may have been biased because the method took no account of acoustic backscatter from mesozooplankton. Here we report our efforts to improve upon these estimates, and to determine TS additionally at 200 kHz, by conducting additional sampling for mesozooplankton and fish larvae, and accounting for their likely contribution to the total backscatter. Published sound scattering models were used to predict the acoustic backscatter due to the observed numerical densities of mesozooplankton and fish larvae (solving the forward problem). Mean volume backscattering due to jellyfish alone was then inferred by subtracting the model-predicted values from the observed water-column total associated with jellyfish net samples. Zooplankton-corrected echo intensity/jellyfish density data pairs were in close agreement with linear relationships determined previously from uncorrected data. Small sample sizes precluded recalculation of TS, but nonparametric pair-wise tests failed to detect any significant differences between echo intensities for jellyfish densities observed in the present study and echo intensities predicted for those densities by density–intensity relationships arising from the previous study. Previous linear density–intensity relationships had y-axis intercepts greater than zero. On the assumption that the positive intercepts were due to backscatter from unsampled mesozooplankton, new TS relationships were calculated from downward-adjusted density–intensity relationships. New values agreed closely with TS estimates determined elsewhere using single-target echo detection techniques. Given that estimates of jellyfish TS appear robust, it should now be feasible to identify jellyfish acoustically at sea and to assess their abundance, even in the presence of mixed mesozooplankton assemblages.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInter-Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMarine Ecology Progress Series;
dc.rightsCopyright Inter-Research. The four year embargo on displaying the full-text article has expired.
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps295105
dc.subjectForward problemen_US
dc.subjectZooplanktonen_US
dc.subjectNamibiaen_US
dc.subjectNorthern Benguelaen_US
dc.subjectMulti-frequency hydroacousticsen_US
dc.subjectBiomass estimateen_US
dc.titleTowards the acoustic estimation of jellyfish abundanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.inquiriesmgibbons@uwc.ac.za
dc.privacy.showsubmittertrue
dc.status.ispeerreviewedtrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record