Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEngdahl, Hans
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-10T06:49:37Z
dc.date.available2017-10-10T06:49:37Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEngdahl, H. (2017). The Black Atlantic as reversal: a reappraisal of African and black theology. HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies, 73(3): a4618en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-8050
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/ 10.4102/hts.v73i3.4618
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/3221
dc.description.abstractIn this article, I will try to do three things. Firstly, pay attention to the notion of Black Atlantic as coined by Paul Gilroy, which in effect could signify a reversal of colonialism and slavery. Secondly, revisit the 1970s and the debate about the relevance of Black theology vis-à-vis African theology, using John Mbiti’s article ‘An African Views American Black Theology’ as entry point. Here, I will discuss contributions also made by Desmond Tutu and James Cone. Thirdly, starting with the premise that both theologies are relevant and soul mates today, which would (probably) be confirmed by all the above mentioned at this point in time, an assessment of current voices will be made, that is, Tinyiko Maluleke and Vuyani Vellem on black and African ecclesiologies from a South African perspective, and Lawrence Burnley on the fate of the Black Church in the United States.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAOSISen_US
dc.rights.uri© 2017. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
dc.subjectBlack Atlanticen_US
dc.subjectAfrican theologyen_US
dc.subjectColonialismen_US
dc.subjectEcclesiologiesen_US
dc.titleThe Black Atlantic as reversal: a reappraisal of African and black theologyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.privacy.showsubmitterFALSE
dc.status.ispeerreviewedTRUE


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record