Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNanima, Robert Doya
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-01T09:22:57Z
dc.date.available2017-11-01T09:22:57Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationNanima, R.D. (2017). An evaluation of Kenya’s parallel legal regime on refugees, and the courts’ guarantee of their rights. Law, Democracy & Development, 21: 42-67en_US
dc.identifier.issn2077-4907
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ldd.v21i1.3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/3244
dc.description.abstractThis article evaluates the existence of a parallel refugee regime in Kenya. The Executive decides on policies and oversees the enactment of laws to regulate the inflow of refugees under the encampment policy. The Judiciary hands down decisions that ensure that only policies and laws, which uphold human rights and constitutional standards, are used. This article argues that the existence of this parallel regime has fundamentally affected the refugees’ enjoyment of human rights in Kenya, despite the courts’ resilient position. To illustrate this regime, the article explores the policy directives of the Executive and the corresponding decisions of the courts between 2012 and 2014. It evaluates the decisions of the courts to illustrate the parallel regime.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.rightsThis journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
dc.subjectRefugeesen_US
dc.subjectParallel regimeen_US
dc.subjectKenyaen_US
dc.subjectHuman rightsen_US
dc.titleAn evaluation of Kenya’s parallel legal regime on refugees, and the courts’ guarantee of their rightsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.privacy.showsubmitterFALSE
dc.status.ispeerreviewedTRUE


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record