Library Portal | UWC Portal
    • Login
    Contact Us | Quick Submission Guide | About Us | FAQs | Login
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • Faculty of Community and Health Sciences
    • School of Public Health
    • Research Articles (SoPH)
    • View Item
    •   Repository Home
    • Faculty of Community and Health Sciences
    • School of Public Health
    • Research Articles (SoPH)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Participatory monitoring and evaluation approaches that influence decision-making: lessons from a maternal and newborn study in Eastern Uganda

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Kananura_Participatory-monitoring_2017.pdf (546.8Kb)
    Date
    2017
    Author
    Kananura, Rornald Muhumuza
    Ekirapa-Kiracho, Elizabeth
    Paina, Ligia
    Bumba, Ahmed
    Mulekwa, Godfrey
    Nakiganda-Busiku, Dinah
    Oo, Htet Nay Lin
    Kiwanuka, Suzanne Namusoke
    George, Asha S.
    Peters, David H.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: The use of participatory monitoring and evaluation (M&E) approaches is important for guiding local decision-making, promoting the implementation of effective interventions and addressing emerging issues in the course of implementation. In this article, we explore how participatory M&E approaches helped to identify key design and implementation issues and how they influenced stakeholders’ decision-making in eastern Uganda. METHOD: The data for this paper is drawn from a retrospective reflection of various M&E approaches used in a maternal and newborn health project that was implemented in three districts in eastern Uganda. The methods included qualitative and quantitative M&E techniques such as key informant interviews, formal surveys and supportive supervision, as well as participatory approaches, notably participatory impact pathway analysis. RESULTS: At the design stage, the M&E approaches were useful for identifying key local problems and feasible local solutions and informing the activities that were subsequently implemented. During the implementation phase, the M&E approaches provided evidence that informed decision-making and helped identify emerging issues, such as weak implementation by some village health teams, health facility constraints such as poor use of standard guidelines, lack of placenta disposal pits, inadequate fuel for the ambulance at some facilities, and poor care for low birth weight infants. Sharing this information with key stakeholders prompted them to take appropriate actions. For example, the sub-county leadership constructed placenta disposal pits, the district health officer provided fuel for ambulances, and health workers received refresher training and mentorship on how to care for newborns. CONCLUSION: Diverse sources of information and perspectives can help researchers and decision-makers understand and adapt evidence to contexts for more effective interventions. Supporting districts to have crosscutting, routine information generating and sharing platforms that bring together stakeholders from different sectors is therefore crucial for the successful implementation of complex development interventions.
    URI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0274-9
    http://hdl.handle.net/10566/3334
    Collections
    • Research Articles (SoPH) [200]

    DSpace 5.5 | Ubuntu 14.04 | Copyright © University of the Western Cape
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace 5.5 | Ubuntu 14.04 | Copyright © University of the Western Cape
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV