Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDurojaye, Ebenezer
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T08:20:52Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T08:20:52Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationDurojaye, E. (2017). A gendered analysis of Section 48(2)(d) of the Zimbabwean Constitution of 2013. Statute Law Review, 38(2): 240–251.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0144-3593
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmw038
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/4030
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this article is to critically review the provision of section 48 (2) (d) of the Zimbabwean Constitution from a gendered perspective. Section 48 (2) (d) of the Constitution would seem to have abolished death penalty for women but retained the same for men. Given Zimbabwe’s commitment to gender equality and respect for human dignity, this article argues that the disparity in the treatment of women and men under this section is not only inconsistent with the notion of gender equality and substantive equality, but also fails to comply with the rules of justifying the adoption of remedial measures. It is recommended that a better approach by the Constitution would be to abolish death penalty in its totality for both men and women.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rightsThis is the author-version of the article published online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmw038
dc.subjectZimbabwean Constitutionen_US
dc.subjectAbolishen_US
dc.subjectDeath penaltyen_US
dc.subjectGenderen_US
dc.titleA gendered analysis of Section 48(2)(d) of the Zimbabwean Constitution of 2013en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.privacy.showsubmitterFALSE
dc.status.ispeerreviewedTRUE


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record