Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChigwata, Tinashe Calton
dc.contributor.authorMarumahoko, Sylvester
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-19T07:52:52Z
dc.date.available2019-08-19T07:52:52Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationChigwata, T.C. and Marumahoko, S. 2017. Intergovernmental planning and budgeting in Zimbabwe: learning the lessons of the past. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 20 1-15.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/4821
dc.descriptionThe Prime Minister’s Directives on Decentralisation and Development of 1984 and 1985 provide the foundation for independent Zimbabwe’s attempts to foster integrated and coherent government. Together with the Provincial Council and Administration Act, Chapter 29:11 of 1985, the Directives established various institutions and mechanisms to facilitate development planning at various levels of government. This paper examines the effectiveness of these institutions and mechanisms – as well as their relevance, since a new constitution was promulgated in 2013, under which provincial and local governments are now tiers of government with directly vested authority.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn Zimbabwe, the Prime Minister’s Directives on Decentralisation and Development of 1984 and 1985, together with the Provincial Council and Administration Act 1985, constitute the foundation for postindependence attempts to ensure effective governance. The Directives provided for the establishment of hierarchical structures and mechanisms to coordinate government activities, including development planning at various levels of government. This paper asks whether these structures and mechanisms have been effective in promoting ‘sound’ intergovernmental planning and budgeting, and whether they are still relevant given that in 2013 Zimbabwe adopted a new Constitution with greater promises, visions and demands than its predecessor, the Lancaster House Constitution. The paper argues that the adoption of a new Constitution provides a valuable opportunity to reform the intergovernmental planning and budgeting process, which to date has proved ineffective in fostering integrated and coherent effective governance.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCommonwealth Journal of Local Governanceen_US
dc.subjectIntergovernmental planningen_US
dc.subjectIntergovernmental budgetingen_US
dc.subjectZimbabween_US
dc.subjectDirectivesen_US
dc.titleIntergovernmental planning and budgeting in Zimbabwe: Learning the lessons of the pasten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record