Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChigwata, Tinashe
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-19T05:34:56Z
dc.date.available2019-08-19T05:34:56Z
dc.date.issued2011-11
dc.identifier.citationChigwata T 'Riot damage - who pays?' (2011) 13 Local Government Bulletin 9en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/4790
dc.description.abstractProtest actions has become part of South Africa's political landscape. The extent to which it is increasingly marked by violence is cause of alarm. Assemblies, pickets, marches and demonstrations are essential features of a democratic society. However, unlawful behaviour when exercising political rights set out in section 17 of the Constitution not only causes damage to public and private property, but also infringes the rights of others. To combat this behaviour, the Regulation of Gatherings Act 205 of 1993 was passed, which criminalises unlawful actions when exercising political rights. The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal provides valuable lessons to labour organisations, protest organisers and municipalities on their role in the context of protest action. This article seeks to analyse the court's judgment.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLocal Government Bulletinen_US
dc.subjectRiot damageen_US
dc.subjectMunicipalitiesen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectRegulation of Gatherings Acten_US
dc.subjectConstitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996en_US
dc.titleRiot damage - who pays?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record