Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorvan Niekerk, Carmel
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-03T07:46:40Z
dc.date.available2022-05-03T07:46:40Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationVan Niekerk, Carmel ‘When is a donor a daddy? Informal agreements with known sperm donors: Lessons from abroad’ Obiter 42:1 (2021) pp. 70–83en_US
dc.identifier.issn2709-555X
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1682-58532021000100005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/7336
dc.description.abstractIndividuals are increasingly entering into informal agreements with known sperm donors in order to either circumvent the costs involved in using fertility centres or owing to personal beliefs and preferences. When they do so, the legal protection that ordinarily accompanies the use of a fertility centre is either sparse or lacking. The question is what happens when one of the parties reneges on the agreement, either by demanding parental responsibilities or rights in the case of the donor or, in the case of the recipient, by demanding that the donor assumes a parental role when this was never his intention. The position in South Africa is currently unregulated. This article, therefore, examines the position in a number of foreign jurisdictions with the aim of making recommendations for the way forward in South Africa.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNelson Mandela Universityen_US
dc.subjectSperm donorsen_US
dc.subjectFertility centreen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectNational Health Acten_US
dc.titleWhen is a donor a daddy? Informal agreements with known sperm donors: Lessons from abroaden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record