Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoosa, Fareed
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-03T12:36:02Z
dc.date.available2022-05-03T12:36:02Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationMoosa, Fareed ‘Interpretation of wills – Does the Endumeni case apply?’ Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 24 (2021) pp. 1–30en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a8129
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/7342
dc.description.abstractThis article argues that the general approach to documentary interpretation articulated in Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality 2012 4 SA 593 (SCA) (Endumeni) applies also to the interpretation of wills, subject to adaptation for context. It is argued that interpretation of wills and the application of an interpretation to a particular factual setting are coequal tasks. Each case must be decided on its own facts. The cardinal rule is the ascertainment of a testator's intention and giving effect thereto, provided that this will not bring about a violation of the law. It is argued that a court must put itself in the armchair of the testator and, after determining where the probabilities lie, it must infer or presume what the testator had in mind at the time that the will was created. Although intention is subjective, the interpretive process to determine a testator's intention is objective in form.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademy of Science of South Africaen_US
dc.subjectFreedom of testationen_US
dc.subjectTeleological interpretationen_US
dc.subjectWills Acten_US
dc.subjectTextual interpretationen_US
dc.subjectEndumenien_US
dc.titleInterpretation of wills – Does the Endumeni case apply?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record