Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Michael K.
dc.contributor.authorGibbons, Mark J.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-13T10:49:56Z
dc.date.available2023-02-13T10:49:56Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationBrown, M. K., & Gibbons, M. J. (2021). Null models for null hypotheses in taxonomy: A test using Scyphozoa. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 134 (1), 240-245. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blab070en_US
dc.identifier.issn1095-8312
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blab070
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/8421
dc.description.abstractAlthough molecular tools are becoming more important in the delineation of scyphozoan species there is, perforce, a need to substantiate new species definitions using morphological data. Access to type material is often difficult and detailed, raw morphometric data are rarely provided in older type descriptions, which makes comparisons of new with old challenging. Here, we use null models based on simple measures of central tendency to generate morphometric data sets for four species of Aurelia, three species of Chrysaora and two species of Crambionella. The results of PERMANOVA and CAP analyses indicate no significant differences between random and real data within species, but significant differences between congeneric species (null or real), suggesting that this multivariate approach may be a useful tool for defining species when comparative data are scant.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.subjectBiodiversityen_US
dc.subjectMarineen_US
dc.subjectMorphologyen_US
dc.subjectTaxonomyen_US
dc.subjectScyphozoaen_US
dc.titleNull models for null hypotheses in taxonomy: A test using Scyphozoaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record