Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKarim, Safura Abdool
dc.contributor.authorDistefano, Michael J
dc.contributor.authorKrubiner, Carleigh B.
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T09:45:26Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T09:45:26Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn10731105
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/9326
dc.description.abstractThe World Health Assembly has encouraged WHO member-states to establish capacity in health technology assessment (HTA) as a support for achieving universal health coverage (UHC). Simultaneously, the WHO has stated that UHC is “a practical expression of the concern for health equity and the right to health.” This has prompted questions about potential tensions between priority- setting efforts and the right to health on the road to UHC. South Africa (SA) is an ideal setting in which to explore how the priority-setting work of an HTA body may be integrated with an existing rights framework.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.subjectJudicializationen_US
dc.subjectPriority Settingen_US
dc.subjectHuman Rightsen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subjectValuesen_US
dc.titleIntegrating health technology assessment and the right to health in South Africa: a qualitative content analysis of substantive values in landmark judicial decisionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record