The constitutionally bound dead hand? The impact of constitutional rights and principles on freedom of testation in South African law

dc.contributor.author	du Toit, Francois
dc.date.accessioned	2011-08-01T08:21:06Z
dc.date.available	2011-08-01T08:21:06Z
dc.date.issued	2001
dc.identifier.citation	Du Toit, F. (2001). The constitutionally bound dead hand? The impact of constitutional rights and principles on freedom of testation in South African law. Stellenbosch Law Review, 2001 (2): 222-257	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1016-4359
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10566/230
dc.description.abstract	This article analyses critically the impact of constitutionalism on freedom of testation and its limitation in South African law. It proposes the judicial utilisation of a 'constitutionally-founded boni mores criterion' in addressing particularly testamentary forfeiture clauses and charitable testamentary bequests.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Juta	en_US
dc.rights	Copyright Juta Law. Permission granted to reproduce the article in the Repository. Please cite original source and link to this site.
dc.subject	Freedom of testation	en_US
dc.subject	Constitutionalism	en_US
dc.subject	Public policy	en_US
dc.subject	Bill of Rights	en_US
dc.subject	Equality	en_US
dc.subject	Non-discrimination	en_US
dc.title	The constitutionally bound dead hand? The impact of constitutional rights and principles on freedom of testation in South African law	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US
dc.inquiries	fdutoit@uwc.ac.za
dc.privacy.showsubmitter	true
dc.status.ispeerreviewed	true