Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPLAAS
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-22T07:33:23Z
dc.date.available2019-02-22T07:33:23Z
dc.date.issued2012-09
dc.identifier.citationPLAAS. (2012). Land redistribution: Part of a wider agrarian reform strategy: Umhlaba Wethu No. 15. Bellville Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Cape.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/4268
dc.description.abstractAn emerging and increasingly more prominent debate amid the considerations of a new White Paper, following the Green Paper process, which will set the legal framework for land reform and agrarian transformation, is whether or not land reform is still a necessity. If not, how do we reverse the unequal land-holding patterns in South Africa? We have yet to see large-scale redistribution of land and a far more equal land outfit. The land-reform programme made limited progress. The Willing Buyer Willing Seller (WBWS) approach, among others, had largely been blamed. Given the insignificant land transfers under the land-reform programmes, the market is clearly not addressing the landlessness and insecure tenure of black people. What the evidence suggests is that the market allows for the de-racialisation of the better-off and creates a more equal ‘elitist’ landed group, but the WBWS cannot be made to work in favour of the poor.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPLAASen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUmhlaba Wethu: A quarterly bulletin tracking land reform in South Africa;15
dc.subjectLand redistributionen_US
dc.subjecten_US
dc.subjectSwellendam local municipalityen_US
dc.subjectJohann Kirstenen_US
dc.subjectGame farmsen_US
dc.titleLand redistribution: Part of a wider agrarian reform strategyen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record