dc.contributor.author | Mirugi-Mukundi, Gladys | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-04T12:03:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-04T12:03:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Mirugi-Mukundi, G. (2011). 'Judicial oversight required for sales in execution of residential property : legislative and policy reform Culture' , ESR Review: 12(1) 6-8 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10566/4884 | |
dc.description.abstract | The Gundwana case was a challenge to the constitutionality of the High Court Rules and practice, which allowed a High Court registrar to grant default judgment, without judicial oversight, declaring immovable property executable. A sale in execution is the act of getting an officer of the court to take possession of the property of a losing party in a lawsuit (judgment debtor) on behalf of the winner (judgment creditor), sell it and use the proceeds to pay the judgment debt. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | ESR Review : Economic and Social Rights in South Africa | en_US |
dc.subject | Judicial oversight | en_US |
dc.subject | Execution | en_US |
dc.subject | Residential property | en_US |
dc.subject | e Gundwana case | en_US |
dc.title | udicial oversight required for sales in execution of residential property : legislative and policy reform | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |