Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRedpath, Jean
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-05T13:26:21Z
dc.date.available2019-12-05T13:26:21Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationRedpath, J. (2007). 'Parallel Policies: Policies relevant to child safety'. Monograph Series No 2, Centre for Justice and Crime Prevention: Cape Townen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/5095
dc.description.abstractThe Centre for Justice and Crime Prevention’s 2005 National Youth Victimisation Study indicated the need to explore existing policy impacting on children from a social crime prevention perspective within a rights-based framework. This policy analysis was commissioned to undertake that analysis. A social crime prevention perspective is one which views crime as a social problem, stemming from the socio-economic environment and facilitated by through the situation in which crime occurs. The risk factors associated with both victimisation and offending of children are such that policy in the poverty alleviation, health, education and criminal justice sectors are relevant to social crime prevention. Poverty is widespread among children. The current social grants framework does not appear equal to the realities of poverty in South Africa. Problems include the exclusion of children over 14 from child support, the overburdening of the foster system as a result of pressure driven by HIV/Aids, and limitations on the availability of the care dependency grant. The overall health of children is poor and appears to be deteriorating. While free primary health care is available, access in terms of transport, medicines and availability of medical staff is problematical. Preventative care may have been neglected in the drive to provide free primary care. There is a lack of recognition that health is influenced by such factors as housing, access to water and sanitation. There is also no single overarching child health policy. Education funding policy may be having the unintended consequences of exclusions, school drop-outs, and trapping poor children in the weakest, poorest schools. Criminal justice and child protection policy have been hampered by a swing to a ‘tough on crime’ approach, which may be exacerbating the social conditions that lead to crime. Children as victims are not yet adequately protected in the system and they are being imprisoned for longer periods, despite imprisonment being ‘a measure of last resort’. Given the matrix of social risk factors South Africa’s children are exposed to – poverty, disrupted families, poor health conditions, inadequate schooling – it is no surprise that children are at risk from both victimisation and offending perspectives. The current policy framework falls short of meeting the challenges posed by these risk factors. There is much to be done from a social crime prevention perspective.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCentre for Justice and Crime Preventionen_US
dc.subjectChild safetyen_US
dc.subjectChildren’s rightsen_US
dc.subjectPoverty alleviationen_US
dc.subjectEducation policyen_US
dc.subjectHealthen_US
dc.titleParallel Policies: Policies relevant to child safetyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record