Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLukas, Muntingh
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-05T13:48:50Z
dc.date.available2019-12-05T13:48:50Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.citationMuntingh, L. 1998. Prosecutorial attitudes towards diversion. NICRO National Office. 1-67en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/5164
dc.description.abstractThis report investigates a number of issues relating to diversion in an effort to make certain recommendations with regard to the running and management of diversion with a particular emphasis on the discretionary powers of prosecutors. The key questions are: To what extent does prosecutorial discretion influence decisions on diversion, and what systems or guidelines should be put in place to facilitate the expansion of diversion? The call for developing guidelines and criteria for diverting juvenile criminal cases is not a new one but there are other issues emerging such as who should apply these guidelines, and are prosecutors in fact positioned correctly in the system to make decisions regarding diversion? Other suggestions have been made with regard to decision-making such as giving Family Group Conferences a central role, but these have not found wide support to date.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was made possible through the financial assistance of UNICEF. The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation to UNICEF for this and other support rendered. The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily that of UNICEF.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNICRO National Officeen_US
dc.subjectDiversionen_US
dc.subjectProsecutorial discretionen_US
dc.subjectJuvenile justiceen_US
dc.subjectNICROen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.titleProsecutorial attitudes towards diversionen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record