Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPiper, Laurence
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-04T12:43:25Z
dc.date.available2021-02-04T12:43:25Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationPiper, L. (2019, June,20-21). Resisting informal settlement upgrading in Cape Town: The battle between developmental and informal governance. City Futures. Dublinen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.academia.edu/39722663/Resisting_informal_settlement_upgrading_in_Cape_Town_the_battle_between_developmental_and_informal_governance
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/5842
dc.description.abstractThe paper explores the peculiar politics of popular resistance to the upgrading of an informal settlement in Imizamo Yethu, Cape Town, following a major fire in 2017. The paper traces the politics around the response to the fire by the city and contending groups of poor residents, many of whom, paradoxically, continue to resist the upgrading of the burn site. While this politics maps somewhat onto identity politics between local and foreign migrants to the city, the paper contends that it is the imposition of what Chatterjee terms developmental governance of needy populations onto emergent but informal forms of entrepreneurship that underwrites this larger conflict. This is but one example of the multiple and contending forms of governance evident in the city that help explain the divergent ways in which residents experience urban rule along racial, national and class lines; and which constitute an obstacle for more just and inclusive rule.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademiaen_US
dc.subjectInformal settlementsen_US
dc.subjectCape Townen_US
dc.subjectInformal governanceen_US
dc.subjectUpgradingen_US
dc.subjectPoor residentsen_US
dc.subjectFire damageen_US
dc.titleResisting informal settlement upgrading in Cape Town: The battle between developmental and informal governanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record