Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTabana, H
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, L
dc.contributor.authorDe Man, J
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T08:19:05Z
dc.date.available2021-05-20T08:19:05Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationTabana, H. et al. (2021). The pandemic of online research in times of COVID-19. BMJ Open, 11(2),e043866en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.uri10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043866
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/6167
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 pandemic has led to an explosion of online research using rating scales. While this approach can be useful, two of the major challenges affecting the quality of this type of research include selection bias and the use of non-validated scales. Online research is prone to various forms of selection bias, including self-selection bias, non-response bias or only reaching specific subgroups. The use of rating scales requires contextually validated scales that meet psychometrical properties such as validity, reliability and - for cross-country comparisons - invariance across settings. We discuss options to prevent or tackle these challenges. Researchers, readers, editors and reviewers need to take a critical stance towards research using this type of methodology.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectMental healthen_US
dc.subjectPsychiatryen_US
dc.subjectSocial medicineen_US
dc.subjectPublic healthen_US
dc.subjectPandemicen_US
dc.titleThe pandemic of online research in times of COVID-19en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record