Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChiliza, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorLaing, Richard
dc.contributor.authorFeeley III, Frank Goodrich
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-19T07:54:52Z
dc.date.available2022-07-19T07:54:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationChiliza, J. et al. (2021). Program sustainability post PEPFAR direct service support in the Western Cape, South Africa. PLos One, 16(5), e0251230. 10.1371/journal.pone.0251230en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.uri10.1371/journal.pone.0251230
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/7608
dc.description.abstractPublic health practitioners have little guidance around how to plan for the sustainability of donor sponsored programs after the donor withdraws. The literature is broad and provides no consensus on a definition of sustainability. This study used a mixed-methods methodology to assess program sustainability factors to inform donor-funded programs.This study examined 61 health facilities in the Western Cape, South Africa, supported by four PEPFAR-funded non-governmental organizations from 2007 to 2012. Retention in care (RIC) was used to determine health facility performance. Sustainability was measured by comparing RIC during PEPFAR direct service (20072012), to RIC in the post PEPFAR period (2013 to 2015). Forty-three semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with key informants. The qualitative data were used to examine how predictor variables were operationalized at a health facility and NGO level.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.subjectPublic healthen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectDonor-funded programsen_US
dc.subjectHIVen_US
dc.subjectWestern Capeen_US
dc.titleProgram sustainability post PEPFAR direct service support in the Western Cape, South Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record