Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZembe-Mkabile, Wanga
dc.contributor.authorSelvarajah, Sujitha
dc.contributor.authorDeivanayagam, Thilagawathi Abi
dc.contributor.authorLasco, Gideon
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-18T12:57:58Z
dc.date.available2022-11-18T12:57:58Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSelvarajah S, Deivanayagam TA, Lasco G, et al. Categorisation and Minoritisation. BMJ Global Health 2020;5:e004508. doi:10.1136/ bmjgh-2020-004508en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps//doi.org:/10.1136/ bmjgh-2020-004508
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/8173
dc.description.abstractThe disproportionate mortality of COVID-19 and brutality of protective institutions has shifted anti-racism discourses into the mainstream. 1 Increased reckoning over categorisations of people demonstrate that racial categories, while imprecise, fluid, time and context-specific, embody hierarchical power. We interrogate categorisations used in the UK, South Africa and the USA; their origins and impact. We emphasise needing to recognise commonality of power structures globally, while acknowledging specificity in local contexts. In identifying such commonality, we encourage use of the term ‘minoritised’ as a universal alternative.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Global healthen_US
dc.subjectGlobal commonalityen_US
dc.subjectMinoritiseden_US
dc.subjectMasking inequalityen_US
dc.subjectData collectionen_US
dc.titleCategorisation and Minoritisationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record