Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOkeyo, Ida
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-11T07:40:14Z
dc.date.available2023-01-11T07:40:14Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationDouglas Glandon, Shinjini Mondal, Ida Okeyo, Shehla Zaidi, Mishal S Khan, Osman Dar, Sara Bennett, Methodological gaps and opportunities for studying multisectoral collaboration for health in low- and middle-income countries, Health Policy and Planning, Volume 34, Issue Supplement_2, November 2019, Pages ii7–ii17, https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz116en_US
dc.identifier.issn0268-1080
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/8259
dc.description.abstractThe current body of research into multisectoral collaborations (MSCs) for health raises more questions than it answers, both in terms of how to implement MSCs and how to study them. This article reflects on current methodological gaps and opportunities for advancing MSC research, based on a targeted review of existing literature and qualitative input from researchers and practitioners at the 2018 Health Systems Research (HSR) Symposium in Liverpool. Through framework analysis of 205 MSC research papers referenced in a separately published MSC ‘overview of reviews’ paper, this article identifies six broad MSC question domains (‘meta questions’) and applies content analysis to estimate the relative frequency with which these meta questions and the research method(s) used to answer them are present in the literature.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOxford Academicen_US
dc.subjectdeveloping countriesen_US
dc.subjectevaluationen_US
dc.subjectgovernanceen_US
dc.subjecthealth systems researchen_US
dc.subjectimplementationen_US
dc.titleMethodological gaps and opportunities for studying multisectoral collaboration for health in low- and middle-income countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record