The hegemonic role of biomedical discourses in the construction of pregnancy loss
| dc.contributor.author | Naidoo, Anika | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-11T09:49:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-01-11T09:49:05Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Andipatin, M. G., Naidoo, A. D., & Roomaney, R. (2019). The hegemonic role of biomedical discourses in the construction of pregnancy loss. Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 32(6), e552–e559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2019.03.006 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1871-5192 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10566/8271 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Pregnancy is constructed as a joy-filled and natural experience with a taken-for-granted expectation that the outcome will be a healthy baby. However, in South Africa approximately 1 in 4 pregnancies end in miscarriage and the stillbirth rate is 24 per 100 live births. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | ScienceDirect | en_US |
| dc.subject | Pregnancy | en_US |
| dc.subject | Loss | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hegemony | en_US |
| dc.subject | Biomedical discourses | en_US |
| dc.subject | Qualitative | en_US |
| dc.title | The hegemonic role of biomedical discourses in the construction of pregnancy loss | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
