Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPourtsidou, Alkistis
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-13T12:13:52Z
dc.date.available2023-04-13T12:13:52Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationPourtsidou, A. et al. (2023). Interferometric H I intensity mapping: Perturbation theory predictions and foreground removal effects. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 519(4), 6246–6256. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad127en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2966
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad127
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/8786
dc.description.abstractWe provide perturbation theory predictions for the H I intensity mapping power spectrum multipoles using the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure, which should allow us to exploit mildly non-linear scales. Assuming survey specifications typical of proposed interferometric H I intensity mapping experiments like Canadian Hydrogen Observatory and Radio transient Detector and PUMA, and realistic ranges of validity for the perturbation theory modelling, we run mock full shape Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analyses at z = 0.5, and compare with Stage-IV optical galaxy surveys. We include the impact of 21cm foreground removal using simulations-based prescriptions, and quantify the effects on the precision and accuracy of the parameter estimation. We vary 11 parameters in total: three cosmological parameters, seven bias and counter terms parameters, and the H I brightness temperature. Amongst them, the four parameters of interest are: the cold dark matter density, ωc, the Hubble parameter, h, the primordial amplitude of the power spectrum, As, and the linear H I bias, b1. For the best-case scenario, we obtain unbiased constraints on all parameters with < 3 per cent errors at 68 per cent confidence level. When we include the foreground removal effects, the parameter estimation becomes strongly biased for ωc, h, and b1, while As is less biased (<2σ). We find that scale cuts kmin ≥ 0.03 h Mpc−1 are required to return accurate estimates for ωc and h, at the price of a decrease in the precision, while b1 remains strongly biased. We comment on the implications of these results for real data analyses.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.subjectAstronomyen_US
dc.subjectPhysicsen_US
dc.subjectCosmologyen_US
dc.subjectStatistics studiesen_US
dc.subjectGalaxy evolutionen_US
dc.titleInterferometric H I intensity mapping: perturbation theory predictions and foreground removal effectsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record