Library Portal | UWC Portal | National ETDs | Global ETDs
    • Login
    Contact Us | About Us | FAQs | Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Faculty of Natural Sciences
    • Medical Bioscience
    • Research Articles (Medical Bioscience)
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Faculty of Natural Sciences
    • Medical Bioscience
    • Research Articles (Medical Bioscience)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting lumbo-sacral nerve root compromise: A systematic literature review

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Tawa_Accuracy of magnetic_2016.pdf (713.6Kb)
    Date
    2016
    Author
    Tawa, Nassib
    Rhoda, Anthea
    Diener, Ina
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: MRI is considered to be the diagnostic tool of choice in diagnosing nerve root compromise among patients presenting with clinical suspicion of lumbo-sacral radiculopathy. There exists controversy among researchers and clinicians regarding the diagnostic utility and accuracy of MRI in detecting nerve root compromise and radiculopathy. This review evaluated 4 primary diagnostic accuracy studies that specifically assessed the accuracy of MRI in detecting nerve root compromise, as established in the current literature. Methods: Eight electronic data bases were searched for relevant articles from inception until January 2014. All primary diagnostic studies which investigated the accuracy of MRI in diagnosing nerve root compromise among patients with low back and referred leg symptoms were screened for inclusion. Qualifying studies were retrieved and independently assessed for methodological quality using the 'Quality Assessment of Diagnostic tests Accuracy Studies' criteria. Results: Four studies qualified for inclusion in this review. The sensitivity of MRI in detecting lumbar nerve root compromise was very low at 0.25 (95 % CI) while the specificity was relatively high at 0.92 (95 % CI). Conclusions: There is lack of sufficient high quality scientific evidence in support or against the use of MRI in diagnosing nerve root compression and radiculopathy. Therefore, clinicians should always correlate the findings of MRI with the patients' medical history and clinical presentation in clinical decision making.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10566/2737
    http://dx.doi.org//10.1186/s12891-016-1236-z
    Collections
    • Research Articles (Medical Bioscience)

    DSpace 6.3 | Ubuntu | Copyright © University of the Western Cape
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace 6.3 | Ubuntu | Copyright © University of the Western Cape
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV