Library Portal | UWC Portal | National ETDs | Global ETDs
    • Login
    Contact Us | About Us | FAQs | Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Dullah Omar Institute for Constitutional Law, Governance and Human Rights
    • Research Articles - Dullah Omar Institute
    • Research Articles - Dullah Omar Institute
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Dullah Omar Institute for Constitutional Law, Governance and Human Rights
    • Research Articles - Dullah Omar Institute
    • Research Articles - Dullah Omar Institute
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Overseeing the overseers: assessing compliance with municipal intervention rules in South Africa

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    de-Visser_Overseeing-the-overseers_2017.pdf (2.078Mb)
    Date
    2017
    Author
    de Visser, Jaap
    November, Jerome
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Section 139 of the Constitution of South Africa empowers provinces to intervene into municipalities, an instrument to correct serious failures in local government. This article discusses the policy and legal framework for interventions and assesses whether the constitutional provisions that circumscribe it, are being adhered to. The starting point is that decentralisation, of which this instrument is part, is rules-based and that adherence to the rule of law is critical for its success. By its very nature, intervention represents an intrusion into the institutional integrity of the affected municipality and adherence to the constitutional safeguards surrounding the intervention is therefore critical. The article sets out the constitutional framework for interventions into municipalities which includes oversight roles for the Minister responsible for local government, the National Council of Provinces and the provincial legislature. It combines this with an assessment of 39 interventions that took place between 2008 and 2014. It presents a provincial breakdown and a breakdown of the legal basis of these 39 interventions. It concludes that provinces don’t use the interventions envisaged in Section 139(4) and (5) but instead almost always intervene in terms of Section 139(1) of the Constitution. The interventions are assessed for compliance with constitutional prescripts, such as the need to establish a failure to fulfil an executive obligation, the timely submission of the intervention to the Minister and the NCOP and their timely approval. The article concludes that a significant number of interventions did not comply with the pro- visions pertaining to the timely submission and approval by the Minister and the NCOP. Furthermore, there is a need to accelerate the adoption of the legislation envisaged by Section 139(8) of the Constitution to further regulate interventions.
    URI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40803-016-0050-x
    http://hdl.handle.net/10566/3837
    Collections
    • Research Articles - Dullah Omar Institute

    DSpace 6.3 | Ubuntu | Copyright © University of the Western Cape
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace 6.3 | Ubuntu | Copyright © University of the Western Cape
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV