Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorElgamri, Alya
dc.contributor.authorMohamed, Nadia
dc.contributor.authorHudaon, Athol
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-16T06:27:36Z
dc.date.available2019-09-16T06:27:36Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationElgamri, A, Mohamed, N, & Hudson, A. (2018). A comparison of the dental age estimation methods of Phillips and Proffit in a sample of South African children. South African Dental Journal , 73(4), 204-207.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0375-1562
dc.identifier.urihttp://ref.scielo.org/p3kmnk
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/4867
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Dental age is an indicator of the physiological maturity of growing children. Different methods for estimating the dental age in contrast to the chronological age have been proposed. Aims and objectives: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the accuracy of the Phillips and the Proffit methods in estimating the dental age in a mixed sample of South African children. Methods: A random selection was completed of 100 panoramic radiographs of patients with known chronological ages, ranging between 6 and 11 years. Dental age for each radlograph was esdmated using both the Phillips and the Proffit methods. Results: The Phillips method underestimated the age of combined sample by four months (statistically significant p =0.03}, whilst the age of the boys sample was underestimated by six months (statistically significant p <0.0001). For the girls' sample, the Proffit method underestimated the age by only two days (not statistically significant p =0.97). Proffit's method underestimated the age of the boys by two months (not statistically significant (P= 0.15). Conclusion: Even though It has not previously been validated, Proffit's description of dental development has been shown to be accurate in estimating the dental age.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe South African Dental Associationen_US
dc.subjectDental ageen_US
dc.subjectPhysiological ageen_US
dc.subjectChronological ageen_US
dc.subjectPhillips tablesen_US
dc.subjectPanoramic radiographen_US
dc.titleA comparison of the dental age estimation methods of Phillips and Proffit in a sample of South African childrenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record