Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLukas, Muntingh
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-05T13:43:43Z
dc.date.available2019-12-05T13:43:43Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationMutingh, L. 2008. SA Crime Quarterly. SA Crime Quarterly. 26, 1-7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/5143
dc.description.abstractThe belief is thoroughly entrenched that prisons fulfil the triple function of punishing offenders, making society safer by removing dangerous individuals, and deterring potential offenders from committing crime. The fact that hundreds of years of evidence suggests that prisons do none of these terribly well has not had any effect on our belief in the utility of this institution. In this article the author suggests that we hold on to these beliefs because they serve the interests of politicians, who can appease their electorate with the clear and simple solution prisons purport to provide; and the private sector, as prisons support their commercial interests in a number of ways. What is needed, the author argues, is deeper discussion and clearer thinking about the value and function of prison.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSA Crime Quarterlyen_US
dc.subjectPunishmenten_US
dc.subjectDeterrenceen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectCriminal justice systemen_US
dc.titlePunishment and deterrence: don’t expect prisons to reduce crimeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record