| dc.contributor.author | Geerts, Greta | |
| dc.contributor.author | Khan, Saadika Begum | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-23T10:56:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-10-23T10:56:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Geerts, G., & Khan, S. B. (2017). Comparing patient-based outcomes related to neutral zone and conventional mandibular dentures: A systematic review. South African Dental Journal.72 (4),284 - 289. Doi: | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0375-1562 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10566/5300 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Neutral zone mandibular dentures are considered tobe superior to conventional complete dentures.Conventional complete dentures (CD) have been the most common
and only treatment modality for rehabilitation of edentulousness
until the introduction of dental implants. Implant-retained or
implant-supported prostheses have been proven to be superior
to conventional CDs in terms of patient-based outcomes (PBOs).'
However, implant therapy may be out of reach of patients due to
a variety of reasons. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | South African Dental Association | en_US |
| dc.subject | Neutral zone mandibular dentures | en_US |
| dc.subject | Patient-based outcomes | en_US |
| dc.subject | Dental implants | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparing patient-based outcomes related to neutral zone and conventional mandibular dentures: A systematic review | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
