Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPiper, Laurence
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-01T09:04:32Z
dc.date.available2021-02-01T09:04:32Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationPiper, L. (2004). Return to the organic: Onions, artichokes and 'the debate' on the nation and modernity. A Journal of Social and Political Theory ,103, 122-140en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41802815
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/5800
dc.description.abstractThere exist in intellectual history periods where, following intense deliberation on a question, something like a consensus emerges. Typically the consensus amounts to a refinement of the competing views on the question rather than some final resolution. These refined views are then presented as the official ‘debate’ on the question, and faithfully reproduced in university courses world-wide. Something of this sort has happened with theories of nationalism, or to be more accurate, with theories of the modernity of the nation. Indeed, the issue of the modernity of the nation looms large in the Smith, Özkrimili and Guibernau & Hutchinson texts.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBerghahn Booksen_US
dc.subjectThe nation as organicen_US
dc.subjectThe nation as onionen_US
dc.subjectThe nation as artichokeen_US
dc.subjectNation and modernityen_US
dc.titleReturn to the organic: Onions, artichokes and 'the debate' on the nation and modernityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record