Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFessha, Yonatan
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-26T09:55:12Z
dc.date.available2021-05-26T09:55:12Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationFessha, Y. (2020). Intergovernmental cooperation, divided societies and capital cities: The case of the Ethiopian capital. Verfassung und Recht in Übersee , 53(1), 12-29en_US
dc.identifier.issn0506-7286
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/6198
dc.description.abstractSome call it Addis Ababa. Others call it Finfinnee. That is the capital city of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. "What's in a name?" In fact, the name is at the centre of the row over the federal capital. Those who opt to refer the capital as Finfinnee claim that the capital belongs to the Oromo. Those that stick to the official name, Addis Ababa, reject the language of ownership. But this is not merely a fight over history. It is a constitutional politics that has gripped the federation. The debate over the Ethiopian capital brings to fore the question about the place of capital cities in multi-ethnic federations. Using the Ethiopian capital as a case study, this article investigates how capital cities can manage the tension between the accommodation of diverse communities and the indigeneity argument that is often used as a basis to claim ownership. The article argues that the mediation of tensions can be best addressed through the framework of intergovernmental cooperation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNomos Verlagsgesellschaften_US
dc.subjectEthiopian capitalen_US
dc.subjectAccommodation of diverse communitiesen_US
dc.subjectThe indigeneity argumenten_US
dc.subjectIntergovernmentalen_US
dc.titleIntergovernmental cooperation, divided societies and capital cities: The case of the Ethiopian capitalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record