Show simple item record

Curbing the abuse of the trust form: the inclusion of penalty and prohibition provisions as well as compulsory audits in the Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1998

dc.contributor.authorManie, Latiefa
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-27T08:00:08Z
dc.date.available2021-05-27T08:00:08Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationManie, L. (2020). Curbing the abuse of the trust form: the inclusion of penalty and prohibition provisions as well as compulsory audits in the Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1998. Stellenbosch Law Review,31(2), 297-314en_US
dc.identifier.issn1996-2193
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.co.za/content/journal/jlc_slr
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/6208
dc.description.abstracthe South African Law Reform Commission (“SALRC”) in its Report (“SALC Report”)1 on trusts expressed its opposition against the inclusion of penalty provisions in the proposed Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988 (“TPCA”). However, with the increase in the number of cases where an abuse of the trust form occurred, the question that will be addressed in this article is whether the TPCA should be amended to include penalty provisions and a so-called prohibition against reckless behaviour, as well as requiring compulsory audits, to combat this problem.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJuta Lawen_US
dc.subjectAbuse of trust formen_US
dc.subjectAlter ego trusten_US
dc.subjectPiercing the trust veneeren_US
dc.subjectTrust Property Control Acten_US
dc.subjectPenalty and prohibition provisionsen_US
dc.titleCurbing the abuse of the trust form: the inclusion of penalty and prohibition provisions as well as compulsory audits in the Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1998en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
ejc-jlc_slr-v31-n2-a6.pdf
Size:
384.0Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record