Library Portal | UWC Portal | National ETDs | Global ETDs
    • Login
    Contact Us | About Us | FAQs | Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences
    • Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS)
    • Research Articles
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences
    • Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS)
    • Research Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    [En]gendering the norms of customary inheritance in Botswana and South Africa

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    En gendering the norms of customary inheritance in Botswana and South Africa.pdf (691.2Kb)
    Date
    2016
    Author
    Kingwill, Rosalie
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The article responds to the article by Weinberg in this issue. She traces the trajectory of court hearings concerning the contested inheritance of land in Botswana, which, after several prior judgements eventually resulted in a positive outcome for the woman litigants. I acknowledge the author’s key argument, which concerns the impact of power relations on the construction of customary law and the reproduction of knowledge in the courts. Certain versions of “custom” were promoted and others stilled to the disadvantage of women. I argue that the normative patterns of landholding are indeed gendered, but do not result in a binary structure of men and women. “Gender” should be disaggregated to take into account a range of status criteria within and across the categories of male and female in order to understand the differential impact of social relations on the outcomes of property struggles. The normative lines of property transmission frequently follow a logic of “family property” that allows for qualifying women to rights of property. Family property has vastly different social and legal consequences to private, individualised property rights. The corollary is that it is misleading to speak of the processes of succession to rights of access to, and control of customary property in terms of one-to-one “inheritance” of land. The concept of “living law” inadequately reflects these social dynamics.
    URI
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2016.1185829
    http://hdl.handle.net/10566/6538
    Collections
    • Research Articles

    DSpace 6.3 | Ubuntu | Copyright © University of the Western Cape
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace 6.3 | Ubuntu | Copyright © University of the Western Cape
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV