Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYu, Tak Wing
dc.contributor.authorAchmat, Ghaleelullah
dc.contributor.authorKock, Luzaan
dc.contributor.authorSmithdorf, Gareth
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-31T12:30:23Z
dc.date.available2021-08-31T12:30:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationYu TW, Achmat G, Kock L, Smithdorf G. Exercise therapy education enriched through interprofessional teaching. Med Educ. 2021;1-2.en_US
dc.identifier.uri10.1111/medu.14619
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/6559
dc.description.abstractBiokineticist and physiotherapy professional scopes of practice are explicit that they are both exercise therapists, meaning that they use exercise as a treatment modality. Despite these well-defined scopes of the profession by the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA), there are examples of infringements where one profession is accused of conducting work supposedly the sole domain of the other.1 This tension related to overlapping professional is present globallyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectphysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectbiokineticsen_US
dc.subjectexercise therapistsen_US
dc.titleExercise therapy education enriched through interprofessionalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record