Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBanda, Felix
dc.contributor.authorMwanza, David Sani
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-25T11:52:05Z
dc.date.available2021-10-25T11:52:05Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationBanda F & Mwanza, D. S. (2020). "The idea was that those who were trained needed to teach others, critical reflections on the 2014 Zambian language of initial literacy policy change." In Ashraf Abdelhay, Sinfree B. Makoni and Cristine G. Severo (eds) Language planning and policy: Ideologies, ethnicities and semiotic spaces of power. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 125-54.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-5275-4441-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/6954
dc.description.abstractJust before the opening of the school calendar in January 2014, the Zambian government announced a change in language in education policy from English to using a designated official regional Zambian language as the medium of instruction from nursery school to grade 4. Taking this language in education policy change in Zambia as a point of departure, this chapter is a critical reflection on language policy pronouncements in Zambia and in Africa generally. We trace the history of contradictions and contestations surrounding language education policies in Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia) through missionaries, the British South Africa Company, the British Colonial Office and the emergent independent African government administrations. Thereafter, we use observation and interview data from teacher training college lecturers, primary and secondary school teachers of Zambian languages, and Zambian languages subject experts to evaluate the 2014 policy shift. The pedagogical implications of the language policy change are analysed considering language zoning, the monolingual/monoglot ideologies, teacher preparedness, material availability, and the apparent gap between the government-endorsed standard Zambian languages and varieties of the same language and the ‘unofficial’ languages spoken by teachers and learners in multilingual practices. We conclude that, although well-intentioned, the new policy is unlikely to yield the required results of promoting early literacy because it has been implemented before teachers were trained, before material was put in place and it ignored the multilingual dispensations in place.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge Scholars Publishingen_US
dc.subjectLiteracy policyen_US
dc.subjectZambian languageen_US
dc.subjectTeachingen_US
dc.subjectEthnicityen_US
dc.subjectEducation policyen_US
dc.titleThe idea was that those who were trained needed to teach others”: Critical reflections on the 2014 Zambian language of initial literacy policy changeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record