Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoola, Fiona Fatima
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Sally Ann
dc.contributor.authorSlabbert, Mathilda
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-26T08:55:55Z
dc.date.available2022-01-26T08:55:55Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSally Ann Murray , F. Fiona Moolla & Mathilda Slabbert (2020) The Textualities of the AutobiogrAfrical, a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 35:3, 519-532. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2020.1759870en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/7128
dc.description.abstractIn your mind’s eye, summon a map of the world—that famous text. There, there is Africa. The familiar, highly visible bulge of head to horn and curve, and the islands as you travel down to the continent’s southernmost point. It is likely that your imagination, like ours, has archived the inherited template of a Mercator projection, the powerful sixteenth-century cartography which remains influential offline and e-nfluential on Google Maps, even though it misleadingly distorts the size of continents. The 30.2 million square kilometers of the African continent appear much smaller than, say, the areas of the US (9.1 million square kilometers), Russia (16.4 million square kilometers), or China (9.4 million square kilometers). In comparison, the corrective cartographic morphing of the GallPeters projection revises the habituated representational geography of the world’s landmasses, showing the relational sizes of continents more accurately.1 Such tensions are not surprising, for the map, we know, is not to be equated with the territory and, in the context of our interest in this special issue in the textualities of the AutobiogrAfrical, divergent cartographies of the same space, drafted from different ideological perspectives, remind us to ask questions about how life narratives might make Africa intelligible. If, as Frances Stonor Saunders observes, “the self is an act of cartography, and every life a study of borders,” then “[e]nvisioning new acts of cartography that give substance and dynamism to the spaces between borders … produces new selves—or, at the very least, new ways of thinking about selfhood—and thus new objects of autobiographical enquiry.” 2 Any map of Africa reflects assumptions about a collective (“Africa”), as well as the political-geographical divisions of nation-states. “Africa” implies degrees of commonality among the (possibly more than) fifty-four countries that comprise the continent. Yet we know the dangers of a single story. Africa is not, after all, a country. Bear in mind, too, that our editorial team is located at the bottom end of the continent in South Africaen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectIdentity and Differenceen_US
dc.subjectBlack Autobiographiesen_US
dc.subjectAfrican Literatureen_US
dc.titleThe Textualities of the AutobiogrAfricalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record