Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFisher, Rose
dc.contributor.authorNatvig, David
dc.contributor.authorPretorius, Erin
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-26T07:24:17Z
dc.date.available2022-08-26T07:24:17Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationFisher, R. et al. (2022). Why is inflectional morphology difficult to borrow?—Distributing and lexicalizing plural allomorphy in Pennsylvania Dutch. Languages, 7(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020086en_US
dc.identifier.issn2226-471X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020086
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/7769
dc.description.abstractIn this article we examine the allomorphic variation found in Pennsylvania Dutch plurality. In spite of over 250 years of variable contact with English, Pennsylvania Dutch plural allomorphy has remained largely distinct from English, except for a number of loan words and borrowings from English. Adopting a One Feature-One Head (OFOH) Architecture that interprets licit syntactic objects as spans, we argue that plurality is distributed across different root-types, resulting in stored lexical-trees (L-spans) in the bilingual mental lexicon. We expand the traditional feature inventory to be ‘mixed,’ consisting of both semantically-grounded features as well as ‘pure’ morphological features.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.subjectBilingual mental lexiconen_US
dc.subjectAllomorphicen_US
dc.subjectLanguageen_US
dc.subjectPennsylvania Dutchen_US
dc.titleWhy is inflectional morphology difficult to borrow?—Distributing and lexicalizing plural allomorphy in Pennsylvania Dutchen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record