Library Portal | UWC Portal
    • Login
    Contact Us | Quick Submission Guide | About Us | FAQs | Login
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • Faculty of Community and Health Sciences
    • School of Nursing
    • Research Articles (Nursing)
    • View Item
    •   Repository Home
    • Faculty of Community and Health Sciences
    • School of Nursing
    • Research Articles (Nursing)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A systematic review of screening instruments for depression for use in antenatal services in low resource settings

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Chorwe-Sungani_A-systematic-review_2017.pdf (976.6Kb)
    Date
    2017
    Author
    Chorwe-Sungani, Genesis
    Chipps, Jennifer
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: In low resource settings, short, valid and reliable instruments with good high sensitivity and specificity are essential for the screening of depression in antenatal care. A review of published evidence on screening instruments for depression for use in antenatal services in low resource settings was conducted. The aim of this review was to appraise the best available evidence on screening instruments suitable for detecting depression in antenatal care in low resource settings. METHODS: Searching, selection, quality assessment, and data abstraction was done by two reviewers. ScienceDirect, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, SABINET and PsychARTICLES databases were searched using relevant search terms. Retrieved studies were evaluated for relevancy (whether psychometric data were reported) and quality. Data were synthesised and sensitivity and specificity of instruments were pooled using forest plots. RESULTS: Eleven articles were included in the review. The methodological quality ranged from adequate to excellent. The review found 7 tools with varying levels of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, including the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Beck Depression Index, Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale 20, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Hopkins Symptoms Checklist-25, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale and Self-Reporting Questionnaire. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was most common and had the highest level of accuracy (AUC = .965) and sensitivity. CONCLUSION: This review suggests that the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale can be a suitable instrument of preference for screening antenatal depression in low resource settings because of the reported level of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.
    URI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1273-7
    http://hdl.handle.net/10566/4169
    Collections
    • Research Articles (Nursing) [190]

    DSpace 5.5 | Ubuntu 14.04 | Copyright © University of the Western Cape
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace 5.5 | Ubuntu 14.04 | Copyright © University of the Western Cape
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV