Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreenberg, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorThow, Anne Marie
dc.contributor.authorHara, Mafaniso
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T12:17:30Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T12:17:30Z
dc.date.issued2017-10
dc.identifier.citationGreenberg et al (2017) 'Trade, food and nutrition security in South Africa: The cases of sugar and poultry’, Working Paper 46. PLAAS, UWC: Cape Town.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/4525
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to consider the role that trade plays in food and nutrition security in South Africa. Despite an established commercial food system, South Africans experience high levels of food and nutrition insecurity – both under-nutrition and rising rates of diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) defines food security as ‘a situation that exists when all people, at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life’1. This paper considers three dimensions of food security – availability, access and nutrition – and unpacks the role of trade across these dimensions at policy level and in practice in sugar and poultry, two key commodities in the food basket of resource-poor South African households. According to the South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (SANHANES- 1) (Shisana et al., 2013:10), 26% of households surveyed nationally reported experiencing hunger, with another 28% of households at risk of hunger. Households in ‘urban informal’ contexts, followed by those in rural formal and then rural informal settings experienced the highest levels of food insecurity. Eastern Cape and Limpopo are the provinces with the highest proportion of food insecure people. The 2005 National Consumption Survey showed that 18% of children in South Africa were stunted, with rural and then urban informal areas most severely affected. ‘Wasting’ (from poor nutrition quality, rather than insufficient food) affected 4.5% of South African children, with 9.3% of children being underweight (DAFF, 2014:9).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Capeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paper;46
dc.subjectTradeen_US
dc.subjectFood and nutrition securityen_US
dc.subjectFood insecurityen_US
dc.subjectSugaren_US
dc.subjectPoultryen_US
dc.titleTrade, food and nutrition security in South Africa: The cases of sugar and poultryen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record