Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMirugi-Mukundi, Gladys
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T12:03:10Z
dc.date.available2019-10-04T12:03:10Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationMirugi-Mukundi, G. (2011). 'Judicial oversight required for sales in execution of residential property : legislative and policy reform Culture' , ESR Review: 12(1) 6-8en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/4884
dc.description.abstractThe Gundwana case was a challenge to the constitutionality of the High Court Rules and practice, which allowed a High Court registrar to grant default judgment, without judicial oversight, declaring immovable property executable. A sale in execution is the act of getting an officer of the court to take possession of the property of a losing party in a lawsuit (judgment debtor) on behalf of the winner (judgment creditor), sell it and use the proceeds to pay the judgment debt.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherESR Review : Economic and Social Rights in South Africaen_US
dc.subjectJudicial oversighten_US
dc.subjectExecutionen_US
dc.subjectResidential propertyen_US
dc.subjecte Gundwana caseen_US
dc.titleudicial oversight required for sales in execution of residential property : legislative and policy reformen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record